Marx weber and durkheim on religion

The call to abandon their illusions about their condition is a call to abandon a condition which requires illusions.

Weber saw rationality as concerned with identifying causes and working out technical efficiency, with a focus on how things work and with calculating how they can be made to work more effectively, rather than why they are as they are.

Rationalists see the history of modern societies as the rise of scientific knowledge and the subsequent decline of non-rational belief. For Durkheim the answer was solidarity, both mechanical individual feeling of commonality with the group and organic created authority figures and moral norms, social control and purpose.

Weber also noted two things that influenced capitalist style economic systems, increase of precious metals, and the increase in population. It is the source of morality for society. Whereas the Lutheran doctrine of Protestantism was contrary to the capitalist spirit Weber argued that the Protestant ethic, with its puritanical aestheticism, encouraged the capitalist spirit.

Weber focused his study on the effect of religion on the development of economic and social systems, including the rise of capitalism, class structures and class conflicts. By participating in religious ritual, the individual feels a part of the group, clan or society as a whole.

In the Eastern religions, Weber saw barriers to capitalism. In other words, numbers of members might still be growing, but this does not mean that all members are faithfully following the rules of pious behaviours expected. These divisions were based around the various totems that were represented by the phratries and clans.

That is strict religious and moral code of self-denial, industry, frugality, hard work, and punctuality. For Durkheim this was a moral concept.

Sociology of religion

He showed that the increasing economic pursuits encouraged by the rise of Capitalism, starting with the Reformation in the16th century, is rooted in the Protestant ethic and the new moral values that arose during that time.

They believed that religion is essentially an illusion; because culture and location influence religion to such a degree, the idea that religion presents a fundamental truth of existence seemed rather improbable to them.

As time went on and specific gods were found to be more effective at producing military victory and economic prosperity, those gods grew in prominence and monotheism became more dominant. His principal interest was in large, global religions with millions of believers.

Sociological Theories of Religion

Marx held that religion served as a sanctuary from the harshness of everyday life and oppression by the powerful. However, while Marx sees god as an idealization of human nature, Durkheim sees god as society itself, in several respects.

The knowledge we have about the world is provided for us by the languages and discourses we encounter in the times and places in which we live our lives. One of the differences between these theories is whether they view capitalism as positive or problematic.

Rituals are necessary to bind together the members of a religious group, and they allow individuals to escape from the mundane aspects of daily life into higher realms of experience. Franklin, a Calvinist, showed how Capitalist style business dealings were justified within the new Protestant teachings.

However, Gellner insists that these disadvantages are far outweighed by the huge technological advances modern societies have experienced as a result of the application of scientific knowledge.

He observed that religious belief encompassed two groups of things, the sacred and the profane. In fact, there was a fear of physical harm for not partaking in the rituals themselves. The symbols can be passed on to members who have not participated directly in the rituals, but who can therefore participate in the rituals vicariously through the stories of those who have participated, and can then carry the symbols with them as well.

He chose this group because he felt they represented the most basic, elementary forms of religion within a culture. In this way moral systems can be efficiently passed through societies. Clearly a major difference between Weber and Durkheim in the area of religion relates to their individualistic versus holistic theories, respectively.

So to study the institutions of religion, as did Marx, Durkheim and Weber, while at first glance might seem at first glance heretical to the believer, actually helps produce building blocks of knowledge that the theologian, believer, evangelist, and any other person may use to understand the workings of the religions in the larger institution of society.

Martin even proposed that the concept of secularization be eliminated from social scientific discourse, on the grounds that it had only served ideological purposes and because there was no evidence of any general shift from a religious period in human affairs to a secular period.Sociology of religion is the study of the beliefs, Classical, seminal sociological theorists of the late 19th and early 20th century such as Émile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx were greatly interested in religion and its effects on society.

Marx Vs. Durkheim.

STUDY. PLAY. The sociological traditions of Marx and Durkheim view religion totally different, yet they agree that religion and religious institutions play a powerful role in influencing a society and the lives of its members (Olson, ). It is against this backdrop that they both discuss religion from a functionalist.

Start studying Marx, Weber, & Durkheim. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.

A critical comparison of Marx and Durkheim's theories of religion. Uploaded by Adam O'Connell. Documents Similar To A critical comparison of Marx and Durkheim's theories of religion. Skip carousel. carousel previous carousel next. Max Weber Economy and Society ESO Religion Durkheim and Weber. uploaded by.

5/5(1). The ideas of three early sociological theorists continue to strongly influence the sociology of religion: Durkheim, Weber, and Marx. Even though none of these three men was particularly religious, the power that religion holds over people and societies interested them all.

They believed that. Marx Weber, Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim Ordinarily, religion is one of the rationales of social orientations, that in one way or another influences the society’s social stability.

This is because religion is the impelling force for regulations in the society as well as a destabilizing drive for transformation.

Marx weber and durkheim on religion
Rated 4/5 based on 42 review